On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 21:02 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:45:59PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > I've never really been clear on the purpose and use of .SECONDARY; the
> > comments in both the GNU make manual and in the code seem odd to me. I
> > would really appreciate
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:45:59PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> I've never really been clear on the purpose and use of .SECONDARY; the
> comments in both the GNU make manual and in the code seem odd to me. I
> would really appreciate anyone out there who is using this (either for
> specific targe
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 17:28 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:57:27AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> > What I'm also interested in is why .SECONDARY made everything slow.
>
> I've put a cut-down makefile demonstrating this here:
> http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/tmp/Makef
Hi Shachar,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:57:27AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> What I'm also interested in is why .SECONDARY made everything slow.
I've put a cut-down makefile demonstrating this here:
http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/tmp/Makefile
First run
$ make setup
(which creates some
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:50:38PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:38:22PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 02:32 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > > The problem was that our compiler generates 2 output files (foo.o and
> > > foo.hi) when compiling one source file
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:38:22PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 02:32 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > The problem was that our compiler generates 2 output files (foo.o and
> > foo.hi) when compiling one source file, and we had thus ended up with
> > a bunch of rules like
> > %.
