On 02/28/2012 08:12 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> Without looking any closer than your email I may prefer to handle this
>> through the maintainer build step, rather than committing gnulib files
>> directly to the make source control. But I'll have to investigate.
>
> I'm aware this can be done
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tim Murphy wrote:
> I had a little look at libtdl. To be brutal I thought that using
> dlopen/LoadLibrary directly was *much* easier. There isn't really
> anything madly complicated about what's being done.
To clarify: when I originally spoke about APR, I was not
On 6 April 2012 21:55, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Paul Smith
>> CC: David Boyce , bug-make@gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:13:47 -0400
>>
>> Maybe this is just irrational prejudice but I've never had a good
>> experience using libtool and I'm SO uninterested in fighting with it in
>> GNU m
> From: Paul Smith
> CC: David Boyce , bug-make@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:13:47 -0400
>
> Maybe this is just irrational prejudice but I've never had a good
> experience using libtool and I'm SO uninterested in fighting with it in
> GNU make.
>
> I will admit that my distaste is so extre
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 22:35 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:30:31 -0400
> > From: David Boyce
> > Cc: tnmur...@gmail.com, bug-make@gnu.org
> >
> > Sorry, I've never used libltdl. Maybe it would have been better just
> > to say "libraries exist to paper over the difference
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:30:31 -0400
> From: David Boyce
> Cc: tnmur...@gmail.com, bug-make@gnu.org
>
> Sorry, I've never used libltdl. Maybe it would have been better just
> to say "libraries exist to paper over the differences between various
> platforms dynamic linking APIs; consider not rei
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, David Boyce wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tim Murphy wrote:
I was thinking of marking this feature as "experimental" in the first
release (in the documentation), just to be more clear on expectations.
Very very much so - there are many platforms to support anyhow
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:08:33 -0400
>> From: David Boyce
>> Cc: "bug-make@gnu.org"
>>
>> Apropos of this, the Apache Portable Runtime has a nice abstraction
>> over dlopen and LoadLibrary.
>
> Is it significantly better than what libltdl
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:08:33 -0400
> From: David Boyce
> Cc: "bug-make@gnu.org"
>
> Apropos of this, the Apache Portable Runtime has a nice abstraction
> over dlopen and LoadLibrary.
Is it significantly better than what libltdl provides? The advantage
of the latter is that it's readily ava
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tim Murphy wrote:
>> I was thinking of marking this feature as "experimental" in the first
>> release (in the documentation), just to be more clear on expectations.
>
> Very very much so - there are many platforms to support anyhow and
> when someone eventually trie
10 matches
Mail list logo
