> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:11:49 +0100
> From: Sebastian Pipping
> CC: psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
>
> Since we would run into buffer overflows with sprintf/vsprintf, we
> rely on snprintf/vsnprintf for that task. Quoting from my "man 3
> printf" output:
>
> snprintf(), vsnprintf():
>
On 02/12/2012 05:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:07:48 +0100
>> From: Sebastian Pipping
>> CC: psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
>>
>> So far both of these have been requirements: (1) keep the overall format
>> translatable so other languages can adjust order of elements an
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:07:48 +0100
> From: Sebastian Pipping
> CC: psm...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org
>
> So far both of these have been requirements: (1) keep the overall format
> translatable so other languages can adjust order of elements and (2) use
> C89 functions, only. It seems that (1