Re: targets/SECONDARY TEST#9 fails sometimes

2011-12-07 Thread Tim Newsome
Does anybody know what the right solution to this problem is? I'm happy to implement/test either one, but I don't want to spend my time working on a solution that won't be accepted upstream. Tim On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Tim Newsome wrote: > TEST #9 in targets/SECONDARY sometimes fails wh

[PATCH]: Continuing touching files after an error

2011-12-07 Thread Atte Peltomäki
Hello, here's a small fix for a corner case I happened to run into. Scenario: Run 'make -t' on an incomplete tree, where a dependency file and the subdirectory it should be in, are completely missing. Make fails and exits. Problem: Run 'make -t -k' to have make continue despite missing de