Re: bug#8938: make timeout and CTRL-C

On 02/07/11 22:38, Alan Curry wrote: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes: >> >> Given the above setsid make example (which hangs for 10s >> ignoring Ctrl-C, I'm leaning towards `make` needing to >> be more shell like, or at least forward the SIGINT etc. >> to the job, and not assume jobs run

[bug #31847] Random errors with parallel build

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #31847 (project make): I think this is also in 3.80: we have a complex make system and we tried hard to check all dependencies but could never get make to work reliably in parallel mode (we use high numbers, say between 8 and 24, so it makes a big difference for us to not

[bug #32307] Documentation does not identify versions at which new features became available

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #32307 (project make): I agree this would be extremely useful. Thank you, Luca Fascione ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Messag

Re: bug#8938: make timeout and CTRL-C

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes: > > Given the above setsid make example (which hangs for 10s > ignoring Ctrl-C, I'm leaning towards `make` needing to > be more shell like, or at least forward the SIGINT etc. > to the job, and not assume jobs run in the foreground group). I'm a little wor

Re: bug#8938: make timeout and CTRL-C

On 29/06/11 10:55, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 28/06/11 20:10, Alan Curry wrote: >> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes: >>> >>> I'm still not convinced we need to be messing with tcsetpgrp() >>> but you're right in that the disconnect between the timeout >>> process group and that of whatever st