PS> however, and so I wouldn't expect people to think that messages to
PS> that list would become bug reports and automatically acknowledged, a
PS> la Debian's BTS etc.
Anyways from all the GNU man pages (but not exactly make's, true, but we
just remember bug-make@gnu.org anyway and wouldn't check
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 07:28 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> I noticed that when submitting bugs to bug-*@gnu.org, unlike other bug
> submission by mail systems, e.g., Deb bugs of Debian, the user receives
> no cheery auto reply acknowledging the bug was ever even received and
> didn't go into a
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 08:57 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> > "PS" == Paul Smith writes:
> PS> If you want a bug report to be filed and acknowledged, then you want:
> PS> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=make
> Thanks for answering! Well that's not the advertised way to su
> "PS" == Paul Smith writes:
PS> If you want a bug report to be filed and acknowledged, then you want:
PS> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=make
Thanks for answering! Well that's not the advertised way to submit bugs.
You advertise bug-*@gnu.org.
PS> The FSF does not use an em
I noticed that when submitting bugs to bug-*@gnu.org, unlike other bug
submission by mail systems, e.g., Deb bugs of Debian, the user receives
no cheery auto reply acknowledging the bug was ever even received and
didn't go into a black hole, or expecting the user to dig out what
happened to his sub
