Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching

2011-03-24 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: > > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t') > > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, unexpected, > > possibly ruinous behavior). This patch seems correct to me. -- ---

Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching

2011-03-24 Thread Luke Shumaker
I agree with you, though I didn't initially. I've noticed that this list doesn't always have timely replies. -- ~ LukeShu http://lukeshu.ath.cx On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 18:12, Michael Witten wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 16:11, Phil

(no subject)

2011-03-24 Thread eldourado
Hello i try to do these but doen´t work command “make “ and “make install” make[1]: Entrando no diretório `/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.4.1/drivers/dahdi/firmware' make[1]: Saindo do diretório `/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.4.1/drivers/dahdi/firmware' You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.

Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching

2011-03-24 Thread Michael Witten
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 18:12, Michael Witten wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 16:11, Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Michael Witten wrote: >>> The `--dry-run' flag is supposed to be safe in that nothing >>> in the file system is actually modified. >> >> That's not actual