[bug #30662] Windows build fails due to missing -I option for subproc/misc

2010-08-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #30662 (project make): Component Version: CVS => 3.82 Fixed Release:None => CVS ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #30662] Windows build fails due to missing -I option for subproc/misc

2010-08-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #30662 (project make): I've modified the options for the files that appeared to have CRLF characters in them, but did not have -kb set, to use -kb so they are treated as binary. Please let me know if I've missed any or this causes any issues. __

[bug #30748] Segmentation violation for SHELL with "strange" character

2010-08-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #30748 (project make): Item Group:None => Bug Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => psmith Open/Closed:

Re: GNU Make 3.82 raises "make: free(): invalid next size (fast)" error when building Android

2010-08-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:26 +0200, Alexis ROBERT wrote: > Something more like ... this ? :) > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0xb7fe1424 in __kernel_vsyscall () > (gdb) backtrace > #6 0xb7ef21cd in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #7 0x080522a6 in func_sort ( >o=0xc6d9eb4 " t/hos

[bug #30833] Bug of color with less? please check

2010-08-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #30833 (project make): Item Group: Bug => None Status:None => Not A Bug Open/Closed:Open => Closed Component Version:

[bug #30897] simple archive rules broken under make 3.82

2010-08-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #30897 (project make): Status:None => Duplicate Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Duplicate of bug #306

[bug #30897] simple archive rules broken under make 3.82

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
URL: Summary: simple archive rules broken under make 3.82 Project: make Submitted by: vapier Submitted on: Sat 28 Aug 2010 10:23:19 PM GMT Severity: 3 - Normal Item Grou

Re: include Makefile path

2010-08-28 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 10:24 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > Is there any way to know a path (absolute, or relative to the primary > Makefile) of an included Makefile? In that included Makefile of > course. Look up the documentation for the MAKEFILE_LIST variable in the GNU make manual. -- --