[bug #30653] intermediate files incorrectly pruned in parallel builds

URL: Summary: intermediate files incorrectly pruned in parallel builds Project: make Submitted by: jeremyd Submitted on: Thu 05 Aug 2010 01:24:56 AM GMT Severity: 3 - Normal

Re: GNU make distribution with proprietary products

On 8/4/2010 2:26 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tom honermann wrote: On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the modified BSD license. Pointing you to non-free software would be wrong, sin

Re: GNU make distribution with proprietary products

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tom honermann wrote: > On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >> There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the >> modified BSD license.  Pointing you to non-free software would be >> wrong, since such software subjugates your rights as a

Re: GNU make distribution with proprietary products

On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the modified BSD license. Pointing you to non-free software would be wrong, since such software subjugates your rights as a computer user. Ah, yes, if only the world were that simple.

Re: [RFC]serialize the output of parallel make?

Hambridge, Philip J (ODP) wrote: I've not been following this thread too closely, but this may be relevant: http://www.cmcrossroads.com/ask-mr-make/12909-descrambling-parallel-build-logs I wrote the linked article; for those not interested in reading it, the strategy described there is the sa

Re: GNU make distribution with proprietary products

I'm interested in finding some examples of proprietary software products (ie, non-GPL licensed) that distribute a copy of GNU make (preferably a binary, with or without changes to the GNU make source code) with the product. If you are aware of such a product, I would appreciate a re

GNU make distribution with proprietary products

I'm a little bit off-topic with this email, please forgive me... I'm interested in finding some examples of proprietary software products (ie, non-GPL licensed) that distribute a copy of GNU make (preferably a binary, with or without changes to the GNU make source code) with the product. If you

[bug #30323] No path in MAKE_COMMAND (with fix)

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #30323 (project make): Hi Eli, > Sorry, I don't follow. I'm not even sure we are talking about the same thing, so let's step back for a moment and see that we understand each other. Ful ACK. > This code's sole purpose is to define the value of $MAKE such that it will

RE: [RFC]serialize the output of parallel make?

I've not been following this thread too closely, but this may be relevant: http://www.cmcrossroads.com/ask-mr-make/12909-descrambling-parallel-buil d-logs One aspect to this issue is that the compiler error messages appear 'mis-aligned' against the sources. I've worked around this for one build sy