Follow-up Comment #9, bug #102 (project make):
I personally think that there should be some sort of message, but it should
be modified so that the user does not think it's an error.
Just appending " (yet)" to the error would probably be enough imo.
Thanks.
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 01:08 -0800, tom honermann wrote:
> There are many valid orders in which the targets can be built. When make
> is invoked with the parallel execution (-j) option, the order in which the
> non-dependent targets are scheduled has a significant impact on the total
> run time.
Y
Hi,
I'm nobody official. I have seen Electric Accelerator using history
files which may be doing something a bit like this.
Personally I don't like the idea of priorities very much. Large
builds that I have done do have big targets but since we are building
5000 of the same kind of target (usin
I'm working on optimizing our GNU make based build system to reduce
build times. Consider the
following dependencies with these run times for each target:
A: # 3 minutes
B: C D # 1 minutes
C: # 1 minutes
D: # 1 minutes
E: # 6 minutes
There are many vali
