Re: GNU make to consider files checksum

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > it looks like a good idea.  Do you think it worths to be discussed with > automake hackers? I'm not actually convinced that this checksumming is a good idea, mainly because I'm not convinced this is enough of a problem. The point of my

[bug #27556] no rule to build target via vpath when jobserver is unavailable

URL: Summary: no rule to build target via vpath when jobserver is unavailable Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Mon 28 Sep 2009 09:00:48 PM UTC Severity: 3 - Normal

Re: [psm...@gnu.org: GNU make: Next release schedule.]

Am Sonntag, 27. September 2009 schrieb Paul Smith: [snip] > I haven't heard from Juan regarding the test suite changes yet, either. Sorry, but due to mayor difficulties with my day time job I cannot care about the testsuite issue anymore. I do not think that this is a mayor issue. The most impo

Re: GNU make to consider files checksum

Hi Philip, it looks like a good idea. Do you think it worths to be discussed with automake hackers? Cheers, Giuseppe Philip Guenther writes: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >> I could find on this ML archives only a thread about this subject: to >> consider the f

[bug #27545] Patch to add Makefile.mak to default file names searched

Update of bug #27545 (project make): Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish Item Group:None => Enhancement ___ Follow-up Comment #1: If you refer to Micro