[bug #16286] VPATH and directory cache

2006-04-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #16286 (project make): All of the behavior you see, as far as I can tell, is expected. The documentation of vpath shows that if the target needs to be rebuilt then the vpath-qualified pathname is thrown away and the target is rebuilt locally (which means that when this

[bug #16286] VPATH and directory cache

2006-04-06 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16286 (project make): Well, that VPATH is useless for anything except leaf targets is what I figured out on my own after some time of inverstigation. If one has to include the object dirs or whatever all over the place anyway, using VPATH just for leaf targets makes th

[bug #16286] VPATH and directory cache

2006-04-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
Update of bug #16286 (project make): Status:None => Not A Bug Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: All of the things you

[bug #16286] VPATH and directory cache

2006-04-06 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: VPATH and directory cache Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Donnerstag 06.04.2006 um 18:15 UTC Severity: 3 - Normal It

[bug #14927] Fix for building archive members in parallel

2006-04-06 Thread Reid Madsen
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14927 (project make): The crux of the issue here is building objects and adding them to archives IN PARALLEL. Up until now, no version of GNUmake has ever supported this capability. Section 11.3 of the GNUmake manual describes the reasons why it doesn't work. This bug

[bug #102] Make prints an incorrect error for missing includes

2006-04-06 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #102 (project make): Just one example: My makefile includes a dependency-file 'makefile.d' which is automatically created by GCC: makefile.d : $(SRCS) $(CC) -mmcu=$(MCU) -E -MM -I. $(INCFIRST) -I$(INCDIR) $(INCLAST) $^ > makefile.d include makefile.d If mak

[bug #3116] recompile changed files first

2006-04-06 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #3116 (project make): Just a guess what he meant: If after changing a soiurce file a 'make clean' is done, it would be a good thing to try to build the target first which has the newest date (the changed one), as it is the one most likely to have errors. This saves a lo