Paul D. Smith wrote:
I believe your problem is related to this bug:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=15110
If you agree, it would be good to add your example as a note to that bug
so that, when we try to fix it, we can include that as a test case.
Paul,
agree
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #15110 (project make):
Paul Smith tells me that the problem I am reporting on the bug-make mailing
list is linked to this one, and I would tend to agree.
Another (simpler?) test case for this issue is as follows:
$ cat Makefile
.SUFFIXES:
-include baz
foo: ; touch $@
I believe your problem is related to this bug:
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=15110
If you agree, it would be good to add your example as a note to that bug
so that, when we try to fix it, we can include that as a test case.
--
Hello,
I have identified what I think is a regression in make 3.81*. I just
verified it to still be present in rc2. I have searched the open bugs
and the mailing list archive, but have not found references to a similar
issue. If they exist, can you please point them out to me :-)
Now to the
Thank you Paul - perfect hit!
> However, this cannot work. See the GNU make Manual, section "Chains of
> Implicit Rules" in the chapter "Implicit Rules":
> No single implicit rule can appear more than once in a chain. This
> means that `make' will not even consider such a ridiculous thing
%% Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> However, this cannot work. See the GNU make Manual, section "Chains of
>> Implicit Rules" in the chapter "Implicit Rules":
>> No single implicit rule can appear more than once in a chain. This
>> means that `make' will not even conside
