On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:18:20AM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>%% Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> rl> P.S. Either way it still tries to run the "h;y/[a-z]/[A-Z]/"
> rl> thing through /bin/sh instead of sed. This doesn't appear to be a
> rl> sed problem, but a make problem.
>
>I'll
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 3/6/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
sr> Suggestion:
sr> We are now warned about an incompatibility in kbuild and we will
sr> fix this asap. But that you postpone this particular behaviour
sr> change until next make release. M
> From: David Ergo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Xavier Marichal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Frippiat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:28:46 +0100
>
> Ok, now I understand. But for MSYS, as it uses unix code, sh_chars_sh is
> not defined
> From: David Ergo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Xavier Marichal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Frippiat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sorry, but as a understand the code, sh_chars_sh is an intermediate
> variable as sh_chars_dos is, and sh_chars is the real varia
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 20:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Sorry, but as a understand the code, sh_chars_sh is an intermediate
> > variable as sh_chars_dos is, and sh_chars is the real variable to use.
>
> That's true.
>
> > I thinks the code is buggy, it should not assume that sh_chars is
> > sh_char
Follow-up Comment #18, bug #15718 (project make):
OK, I've applied Eli's patch.
This bug/thread has gotten way out of control: I can't determine what's
actually a real problem and what's just a misunderstanding. Can one or more
of the principles followup with a comment clarifying what the real
Follow-up Comment #19, bug #15718 (project make):
The real bugs wrt SHELL that still need to be worked on are:
1. When the Windows port searches along PATH for a shell whose name is not
cmd, it does not try to append the executable extensions, so SHELL=foo would
not find foo.exe
2. If the value
%% Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sr> I foresee a lot of mails to lkml the next year or more with this
sr> issue if kept. People do build older kernels and continue to do so
sr> the next long time. Especially the embedded market seem keen to
sr> stay at 2.4 (wonder why), and as s
> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:17:20 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The fact that it doesn't work with setting SHELL from the command line might
> mean there's another place in the code where the special treatment of cmd
> should be added. Hmmm...
Fixed thusly:
2006-03-04 Eli
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 18:38, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: David Ergo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:08:10 +0100
> > Cc: Xavier Marichal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Frippiat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I managed to compile a working version of make 3.81
10 matches
Mail list logo
