Hi Paul,
[...]
jg> main.c:420: warning: missing initializer
jg> main.c:420: warning: (near initialization for `switches[30].type')
This one, IMO, could be a bug in GCC. As far as I can tell the
initializer is correct. The only way to avoid the warning seems to be
to put a full suite of 0
Hi Paul,
[...]
jg> I expect those macros were intended to be used with signed values,
jg> and now they are being used with unsigned values as well, which is
jg> bad.
No, I don't think so. I don't remember the details but my recollection
is that they were specifically designed to work wit
