Re: GNU make 3.81beta3 released

2005-06-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: dvl> There is a real issue which should be dealed with before release: dvl> "gcc -M -MF" doesn't aware of new make behaviour (second expansion) and dvl> sometimes (e.g. for libjava files which contain $ symbols) produces dvl> inappropriate d

Re: GNU make 3.81beta3 released

2005-06-28 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:11:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've released GNU make 3.81beta3. Many bugs have been fixed and some > new features added. My main immediate goal is to get everyone to test > all the ports, and especially work out what to do about the various > DOS/Window

Re: GNU Make version 3.79.1

2005-06-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Hi Lane; please try to use a descriptive subject line for your email, relating to the problem you're having. Including the version of GNU make is very important (thanks!) but better reserved for the body of your message, along with other critical information like the type of system you're running

Re: [PATCH] small fix for test suite

2005-06-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
OK, thanks. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professiona

Re: GNU make 3.81beta3 released

2005-06-28 Thread Earnie Boyd
On 10:49:44 am 2005-06-28 "Earnie Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10:35:55 am 2005-06-28 "Earnie Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 4:11:19 am 2005-06-28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > > > > > I would like to concentrate on real bugs and

Re: GNU make 3.81beta3 released

2005-06-28 Thread Earnie Boyd
On 4:11:19 am 2005-06-28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > I would like to concentrate on real bugs and compile errors, and not > worry about compile warnings unless they're actually causing problems. > I will spend some time on code cleanups in the next release. >

GNU Make version 3.79.1

2005-06-28 Thread Lane Kong \(LCL\)
Hi, I have a problem need someone help me out. I use the GNU make utility to compile a Oracle Pro*C file into executable, but no matter how I play around the make file, I could not keep the middle temporary C file which is created by Pro*C compiler and this middle file was always automatically

Re: GNU make 3.81beta3 released

2005-06-28 Thread Earnie Boyd
On 10:35:55 am 2005-06-28 "Earnie Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4:11:19 am 2005-06-28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > > I would like to concentrate on real bugs and compile errors, and > > not worry about compile warnings unless they're actually ca

Re: Test failure in current cvs make

2005-06-28 Thread Art Haas
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:25:37PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote: > Yeah, it's a timing thing on foo.x, not related to -W. > > foo.x is always rebuilt when -W bar.x is given, which is correct. > However, sometimes (if the original file and its update happen too > quickly) make doesn't see that the ti