Re: make automatically remove and ignore a dependency files specified in a non static rule

2004-07-07 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Christophe Vial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cv> The static rule seems to behave as I would expect. But the non cv> static one automatically does a rm of the dependency... cv> Am I missing something? Look up intermediate targets in the GNU make manual. Cheers! --

make automatically remove and ignore a dependency files specified in a non static rule

2004-07-07 Thread Christophe Vial
Hi, I found that weird behavior while experimenting with the static rules capabilities and I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature. Here is a simple testcase: % cat Makefile titi.test : %.test : %.testsrc echo "special test" %.test : %.testsrc echo "normal test" %.test

Re: target-specific 'define'd variables (3.80)?

2004-07-07 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not really clear to me when it's that useful to query, at a > _GLOBAL_ scope like this, what target-specific variables are set for a > given target. This will allow (theoretically) hierarchical namespaces, e.g., .PHONY: /a% /a/b% /a%: foo := F