> av> The main thing I noticed is the built-in dependency scanner for
> av> source code. That would be a welcome addition to GNU make. OPUS
> av> had it, and it will be missed.
>
>You can get automated dependency scanning with GNU make, it just
doesn't
>come built-in. But it's not hard to achi
On 10 Nov 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> Surprise #3: refactor like this
>
> $(TEX) : junk
>
> junk: $(SOURCES)
> ./bin/plit -n $(SOURCES)
>
> touch Blah.sml. Now make modules.tex runs the last rule (once), but
> not the first rule (for modules.tex itself), even though it clearly is
> out
Hi,
[Please retain the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so that the Debian Bug Tracking system can record your
input]
This has been reported by a debian user.
Package: make
Version: 3.80-4
I have always thought that a normal (non-pattern) rule with multiple
targets gets run mul
Hi,
[Please retain the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so that the Debian Bug Tracking system can record your
input]
This has been reported by a debian user.
In some cases, GNU make ignores some double-colon rules when dry-run.
Assumed this Makefile is given
all: foo.1 foo.2
