"J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:01:33 BST
> Hello,
>
> on the 24/09/03 05:38, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> > %% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > jg> I think expanding the output would be helpful. I would like to
> > jg>
>
> am> It looks like a Class View, the widget is a tree, that shows the
> am> directives of the makefile, it turns out to be practical, for
> am> makefile browsing etc .. select a node it position the editor
> am> cursor at the right place, future could do some quick action, like
> am>
>
> Alain Magloire wrote:
> > I am just looking for feedbacks on how to tackle the issue, maybe the answer
> > is not to change make and build other tools around it that can exploit its
> > build paradigm?
> > The goals are simple, help the users in the development cycle.
>
> We have a standard,
Alain Magloire wrote:
> I am just looking for feedbacks on how to tackle the issue, maybe the answer
> is not to change make and build other tools around it that can exploit its
> build paradigm?
> The goals are simple, help the users in the development cycle.
We have a standard, well-documented m
%% "Alain Magloire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
am> It looks like a Class View, the widget is a tree, that shows the
am> directives of the makefile, it turns out to be practical, for
am> makefile browsing etc .. select a node it position the editor
am> cursor at the right place, future co
>
> am> Let's start with a few:
>
> am> 1) Error Parsing.
>
> What about it?
>
> am> 2) Makefile editing/parsing.
>
> Why is editing makefiles something that GNU make needs to handle? There
> are things like Emacs makefile mode, for example, that already do a very
> nice job of this.
>
Bonjour
> am> (1) && (2)
> am> I've dealt with those a little differently: by providing in the
> am> IDE a Makefile Editor that understands GNU peculiar(really
> am> peculiar/inconsistent 8-) syntax, it provides:
>
> There's nothing about GNU make syntax that's more peculiar or
> inconsi
%% Mary Felkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mf> I don't know if it's a bug or not, but when I use make it keeps
mf> tying to write things into /usr/local/ into which I
mf> don't have write permission. So, it fails.
GNU make never tries to write anything anywhere. It doesn't even use
any tem
Hi,
I don't know if it's a bug or not, but when I use make it keeps tying
to write things into /usr/local/ into which I don't have
write permission. So, it fails.
If make is supposed to make it easy to install programs, why can't
it either install (or compile or whatever) the files into the direct
