Re: Path to binary in --help or --version

2003-07-08 Thread J. Grant
Hello, I have different win32 builds, which I do not think are sufficiently different in their --help. I'm not sure if they should do this either. I thought something appended to the help output such as below would make it clear: __ Path to binary: /usr/local/bin/make Report bugs to <[EMAIL P

[patch] Add GNUMAKEFLAGS override to make

2003-07-08 Thread Kris Warkentin
Hi, This patch allows a GNUMAKEFLAGS environment variable to override MAKEFLAGS. The reason for this is because Microsoft's nmake also uses MAKEFLAGS and this could potentially cause a conflict on hosts with multiple development environments. I expect that this isn't the most elegant way to imple

Re: make 3.80 on Ultrix 4.3

2003-07-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Christian Krackowizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ck> I've problems compiling 3.80 on Ultrix 4.3. Compiler is gcc 2.5.3 ck> 3.80 built well on Dec OSF 1 3.2C, AIX 4.1.5 and HP-UX 10.20 using ck> the same compiler. If you need further information please let me ck> know >> main.c: In

make 3.80 on Ultrix 4.3

2003-07-08 Thread Christian Krackowizer
Hallo, I've problems compiling 3.80 on Ultrix 4.3. Compiler is gcc 2.5.3 3.80 built well on Dec OSF 1 3.2C, AIX 4.1.5 and HP-UX 10.20 using the same compiler. If you need further information please let me know Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:09:31 +0200 From: System APRIVILEGED Account <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Path to binary in --help or --version

2003-07-08 Thread lasse.makholm
> -Original Message- > From: ext Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:21 AM > To: J. Grant > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Path to binary in --help or --version [SNIP] > I'm still not very clear on why you want the path to make. > It seems to