Re: problems with $(eval include...)

2003-06-30 Thread Fabio Alemagna
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Peter A. Kerzum wrote: > Yeah, Fabio's way seem quite clean and pretty. I agree that eval should > support include. > > > Sure. You specify that the other prerequisites also depend on exe-deps: > > > > foo: exe-deps foo.o bar.o baz.o > > foo.o bar.o baz.o: exe-deps > > >

Re: problems with $(eval include...)

2003-06-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Peter A. Kerzum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: pak> Yeah, Fabio's way seem quite clean and pretty. I agree that eval pak> should support include. $(eval ...) does support include. What Fabio wants to do is declare new prerequisites inside of a command script. That may not be possible in a

Re: problems with $(eval include...)

2003-06-30 Thread Peter A. Kerzum
Yeah, Fabio's way seem quite clean and pretty. I agree that eval should support include. Sure. You specify that the other prerequisites also depend on exe-deps: foo: exe-deps foo.o bar.o baz.o foo.o bar.o baz.o: exe-deps But as far as I understand make this will cause troubles if exe-deps