On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:17:45PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> In fact, it was a regression in 3.79.1 which allowed it to "work" there,
> and I fixed that bug in 3.80. If you use older versions of GNU make
> you'll see they work like 3.80, not 3.79.1.
Thanks!
Then I apolog
%% Ted Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ts> The essence of what you are asking is, "Why isn't the '@'
ts> indication of no-echo respected by Make's $(call ) function and
ts> applied to the entire call?
ts> IIUC, the answer is that you need to consider how "define/endef"
ts> differs fro
On 20 Jun 2003, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Posted the following a few weeks ago - wondered if anyone could explain it.
> I have stripped down the background info a bit - so the essense is kept.
>
>>
>> The culprint is the extra line:
>> "echo hello again"
>> It should not be there
Hi all.
Posted the following a few weeks ago - wondered if anyone could explain it.
I have stripped down the background info a bit - so the essense is kept.
TIA,
Sam
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:50:53PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The following makefile exhibit the problem, also at my ins
%% "FND-AD Qin Feng (NGN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
fqf> Following is my makefile:
fqf> SHELL:=/usr/bin/sh
fqf> PWD:=$(shell pwd)
fqf> all:
fqf> @echo dir: $(PWD)
fqf> but the result is :
fqf> dir:
fqf> it seems no shell command executed, my gmake version
Hi,
Following is my makefile:
SHELL:=/usr/bin/shPWD:=$(shell
pwd)
all: @echo dir:
$(PWD)
but the result is :
dir:
it seems no shell command executed, my gmake version is
v3.80 and platform is : OSF1 ds10.sbell.com.cn V4.0 1229
alpha
King
Reg
