I can't imagine what the problem might be... certainly bash works fine
for me with GNU make on Linux and Solaris...
--
---
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org
> Ted Stern writes:
> > I'm having problems building a program on Digital UNIX V4.0F, and
> > it seems to boil down to the following observed behaviour on this
> > platform. The results from issuing `make' with this makefile:
> What happens if you specify
> SHELL := /bin/ksh
OK, h
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matt Hodges wrote:
>> Ted Stern writes:
>
> > > I'm having problems building a program on Digital UNIX V4.0F, and
> > > it seems to boil down to the following observed behaviour on this
> > > platform. The results from issuing `make' with this makefile:
>
> > What hap
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matt Hodges wrote:
> I'm having problems building a program on Digital UNIX V4.0F, and it
> seems to boil down to the following observed behaviour on this
> platform. The results from issuing `make' with this makefile:
What happens if you specify
SHELL := /bin/ks
I'm having problems building a program on Digital UNIX V4.0F, and it
seems to boil down to the following observed behaviour on this
platform. The results from issuing `make' with this makefile:
--
FUBAR=$(shell echo fubar)
all:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> Hm. Have you applied the patch contained in Bug 1517?
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=1517&group_id=71
Hi Paul,
Just completed a test of my build using a rebuilt 3.80 with the bug 1517
patch. [Note to WendyP -- this was usin
Hi, thanks for your reaction.
I understand that the most sensible thing for us to do is to upgrade. I
will do so and see whether the problem persists.
More later,
best regards Willi Doeringer
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Johan Bezem wrote:
> Please keep the mails on the list (reply-to set).
>
> To star
