%% "Khamenia, Valery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ah, OK, I understand now. I thought this was an example of
>> doing it the "fast" way, and the other was an example of doing it
>> the slow way. I'll try to generate a test case with similar
>> sizes to what you have.
kv> Thank y
Hi,
Here is a patch (against GNU make 3.79.1, sorry) which fixes Gregoire's
problem. However, I'm not used to GNU make, so I certainly overlooked
something.
The idea is that every RM_DONTCARE file gets its dontcare flag set,
even if we already saw that file in some other rule.
Then, the
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Grégoire Sutre wrote:
>
> The following makefile goes through:
>
> ---
> all:
>
> dummy-fake:
>
> %.depend : %.c
> touch $@
>
> # Dependencies
>
> -include fake.depend
> ---
> localhost $ gmake
>
%% Ted Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ts> I'll let Paul explain why, as I would probably make a botch of it. ;-)
I think it's a bug :)
As Gregoire points out, the fact that a non-intermediate target exists
somewhere in the makefile shouldn't cause make's rebuilding of the
included makefile
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 21:44, you wrote:
> %% Grégoire Sutre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> gs> I was having errors with my Makefiles (for Objective Caml), and I
> could gs> pinpoint the problem with the attached very simple Makefile.
>
> gs> Basically (please see the attached Makefile),
