Re: Redhat Linux 7.1 and GNU make 3.79.1

2002-08-29 Thread Albert Chin-A-Young
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:48:38PM -0500, china wrote: > $ cd /tmp > $ cat a.sh > #!/bin/sh > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=bar make all > $ cat Makefile > all: > set > > $ /tmp/a.sh | grep LD_LIBRARY_PATH > [empty] > > Why? I've tried the above on AIX, IRIX, and Solaris and > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is in t

Redhat Linux 7.1 and GNU make 3.79.1

2002-08-29 Thread Albert Chin-A-Young
$ cd /tmp $ cat a.sh #!/bin/sh LD_LIBRARY_PATH=bar make all $ cat Makefile all: set $ /tmp/a.sh | grep LD_LIBRARY_PATH [empty] Why? I've tried the above on AIX, IRIX, and Solaris and LD_LIBRARY_PATH is in the output. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___

Re: Question

2002-08-29 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Kowalski, Dennis M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: kdm> I am using GNU make 3.79.1 on a Sun Solaris box. I think there is some confusion here. kdm> I have a dot h file that has includes in it. kdm> i.e. kdm> a.h kdm>#include b.h kdm> I have a new b.h in the NODE1 include di

Question

2002-08-29 Thread Kowalski, Dennis M
Hi I am using GNU make 3.79.1 on a Sun Solaris box. I have encountered the following situation. I have a dot h file that has includes in it. i.e. a.h #include b.h I have a new b.h in the NODE1 include directory The a.h and older b.h are in the NODE2 include directory NODE1/include b.