Re: make: expand.c:489: allocated_variable_append: Assertion failure

2002-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
I believe this patch fixes this problem. It does for me anyway. --- make-3.79.1/expand.cMon Jun 19 16:23:57 2000 +++ make/expand.c Wed Jan 17 13:28:41 2001 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ /* Recursively expand V. The returned string is malloc'd. */ -static char *allocated_variable_appen

make: expand.c:489: allocated_variable_append: Assertion failure

2002-02-21 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, [Please retain the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that the Debian Bug Tracking system can record your input] This has been reported by a debian user. Consider this minimal makefile: == e

Re: a question to warnings from make

2002-02-21 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Helmut Dipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: hd> What can I do to avoid those warnings? You need to synchronize your clocks better. hd> The clocks of both machines are synchronized daily with a hd> difference lower than one minute. One minute is a _huge_ amount of time, to make. You ne

Re: Dependency issue in GNU Make?

2002-02-21 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Michael Opdenacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I found the below problem using GNU Make 3.79.1. > What do you think? I'm not the maintainer of GNU Make, but I had a similar problem last fall. When I investigated the source I found that support for -t in 3.79.1 is indeed broken. I came up whit

a question to warnings from make

2002-02-21 Thread Helmut Dipper
Hello, I only have a question to warnings from make: There is a file-tree on machine "phosphat" (platform SunOS) and a make, after a "all-clean", running on machine "pollux" (platform Linux) to make "all" for this file-tree. During the make I got a number of warnings like: make[5]: *** Warning: