Thank you very much for your prompt -- and clear -- reply. I'll have my
colleague fire up his browser.
Regards,
Jim
Paul D. Smith wrote:
>%% Jim Tison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jt> A colleague of mine asks an interesting question about VPATH. He
> jt> claims that, within the execution
%% Jim Tison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jt> A colleague of mine asks an interesting question about VPATH. He
jt> claims that, within the execution of a single makefile, he has
jt> just made an object within a directory path named as one of the
jt> VPATH operands (not cwd). The very next
Folks:
We're back on 3.76.1 because we're running GNU make on a non-mainstream
platform for which the port was done some years ago -- nobody's done the
update port to 3.79.1 yet (although I'm giving it serious consideration).
A colleague of mine asks an interesting question about VPATH. He cla
