Scripsit "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> %% Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hm> By the way, it is not *every* make that behaves this way. At least
> hm> /usr/ccs/bin/make on SunOS 5.7 doesn't.
> Yes it does.
Mea culpa - apparently I didn't think too well during the exper
%% Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hm> OK, it turned out to be a case of my worldview needing adjustment.
hm> Somehow I've managed to go through life thinking that make works in
hm> three separate phases:
hm> 1. Read in the Makefile, expanding variables etc as you go
hm> 2
Scripsit "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> %% Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hm> Hm (checks it..) it works. Amazing. Where should I have looked for
> hm> that behavior in the documentation?
> However, (a) every make has always behaved this way,
OK, it turned out to be a c
%% Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> %.ui : %.sig
>>@[ -f $@ ] && mv $@ $@.old
>>mosmlc -c $<
>>@cmp -s $@ $@.old && mv $@.old $@
hm> Hm (checks it..) it works. Amazing. Where should I have looked for
hm> that behavior in the documentation?
I don't think it'
%% Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hm> Among the things exported by a module is type definitions, and the
hm> declarations in a .sig file can refer to type definitions exported from
hm> another module. Such imports get resolved during the compilation of a
hm> .sig file, such t
Gentlemen,
I use GNU make to build a medium-sized (18 Kloc) set of programs
written in Moscow ML. It works fine, but I would like it to work
a little finer still.
Background: Moscow ML has a module system where, among other things
each module has a human-created interface definition in a file ca
Á¤º¸È½Ã½ºÅÛ ±¸Ãà Á¦¾È °Ç.
´çÀå ÇÊ¿äÄ¡ ¾Ê´õ¶óµµ Â÷ÈÄ¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¹Ç·Î º¸°üÈÄ »ç¿ë ¶Ç´Â ÁÖÀ§¿¡ ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÒ
°æ¿ì Àü´ÞÀ» ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã¸é °¨»ç ÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.
(ÁÖ)Çü»ó°úÄÄÇ»ÅÍ&µ¥ÀÌŸÁ¤º¸±â¼úÀº ±Ý¹ø Á¤ºÎÀÇ 3¸¸°³ Áß¼Ò±â¾÷ ITÈ Áö¿ø»ç¾÷¡»¿¡ ¼±Á¤°ú º¥Ã³±â¾÷À¸·Î È®ÀÎµÈ º´¿ªÆ¯·Ê ÁöÁ¤¾÷ü·Î
±Í»
