Re: GNU make bug

2001-10-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
GNU make does support Windows, but not at version 3.74. Support for Windows was not added until version 3.75. If you have a version of GNU make for 3.74 on Windows it must be part of the Cygnus package: that version of GNU make is slightly different than the standard GNU version and you need to

GNU make bug

2001-10-08 Thread Abe Shen
To Whom It May Concern: This problem only appears in WindowsNT GNU make. If GNU make does not support WindowsNT, please just indicate so. I am using Wind River Systems (www.windriver.com) Tornado software which employes GNU make as well as other GNU tools. I am using it in WindowsNT platform.

Re: Make on alpha-linux

2001-10-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jorn Tomanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jt> I am using make 3.79.1 on alpha-redhat-linux-gnu. jt> It seems that make is removing LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the jt> environment, which means that following simple makefile fails jt> (even if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set of course): jt> all: jt

Re: Problem Report

2001-10-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
My recollection is that this is a "feature" of AIX: GNU make never touches any of these environment variables. If you install a program as SUID or SGID, then the system will unset these variables itself. By default GNU make installs with the setgid bit set on AIX in order to be able to determine

Problem Report

2001-10-08 Thread Robert Martin
Problem: gmake clobbers environment variable named 'LIBPATH' on AIX.   Description: While installing and testing a temporary fix for IBM's Visual Age C++ compiler, we discovered that an environment variable named 'LIBPATH', which was essential to the compiler fix, was apparently being unset

Make on alpha-linux

2001-10-08 Thread Jörn Tomanik
Hello, I am using make 3.79.1 on alpha-redhat-linux-gnu. It seems that make is removing LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the environment, which means that following simple makefile fails (even if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set of course): all: env | grep LD_LIBRARY_PATH Is there a patch for this bug ? Re