Re: GNU make patch to avoid stack limit brain damage on Solaris 2.6

Thanks Paul. Applied and rebuilt "make". Works fine. Thanks again Cheers srp On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Paul Eggert wrote: > Here's a patch to work around the GNU make problem noted by > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Solaris 2.6. This code uses the same basic > idea as code already in GCC 3.0.1. > > I attem

Re: basename function does nothing when it appears in prerequisites

>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:18:15 -0400, Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: P> In this case, what is basename of "%"? Just "%" itself, so you end up P> with this: P> foo.xx: %: % Thank you for the clear explanation. It is not the first time you have provided one for me!

Íå óäàëÿéòå, ïîæàëóéñòà, ýòî ïèñüìî, ÷òîáû ïîòîì íå æàëåòü âñþ æèçíü îá óïóùåííîé óäèâèòåëüíîé âîçìî

Title: Post Message   Çäðàâñòâóéòå!   Ìåíÿ çîâóò Ñåðãåé. Èçâèíèòå çà áåñïîêîéñòâî, íî íå òîðîïèòåñü óäàëÿòü ýòî ïèñüìî - îíî ìîæåò ñûãðàòü âàæíóþ ðîëü â Âàøåé æèçíè! Èìåííî òàê ïðîèçîøëî ñî ìíîé ïîñëå ïîëó÷åíèÿ - íåêîòîðîå âðåìÿ íàçàä - òàêîãî æå ï

For TOP Manager

KOI.. KOI. KOI îÁ ÓÔÏÌ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÀ - ÌÉÞÎÏ É ÓÒÏÞÎÏ! îÁÓÔÁÌÏ ×ÒÅÍÑ ÐÏÄ×ÅÓÔÉ ÉÔÏÇ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔÏ× É ÚÁÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÔØ ÂÕÄÕÝÅÅ ÐÅÒÅÄ ÎÁÞÁÌÏÍ ÄÅÌÏ×ÏÊ ÁËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ!!! ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ "ðòïòù÷ ÷ õðòá÷ìåîéé" - ×ÏÔ, ÞÔÏ ÐÏÍÏÖÅÔ... óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÐÒÅÄÎÁÚÎÁÞÅÎ ÄÌÑ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ Ï

make for Sun Solaris 7.

I tried to compile Unix::Syslog from CPAN for perl, and i've got something like this: ___ cpan> install Unix::Syslog Going to read /cpanperl/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz Going to read /cpanperl/sources/modules/02packages.

RE: basename function does nothing when it appears in prerequisites

%% Matt Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ms> I understand the explanation, but I do not understand why, if it ms> applies to the $(basename) function, it does not apply to the ms> $(addsuffix) function. If addsuffix behaved like basename, then ms> the dependency list for the target foo.

RE: basename function does nothing when it appears in prerequisites

I understand the explanation, but I do not understand why, if it applies to the $(basename) function, it does not apply to the $(addsuffix) function. If addsuffix behaved like basename, then the dependency list for the target foo.yy would be ".zz" instead of "foo.yy.zz" (which it is by experiment

Re: basename function does nothing when it appears in prerequisites

%% Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ms> The following sample makefile should not produce the error it does ms> produce (output follows the makefile). The $(basename ...) ms> function should work when it appears in the prerequisites section ms> of a rule, but it does nothing.