doc page numbers?

2001-06-22 Thread amw18
Hello Gnu.org- Using my RedHat Linux version 6.2, I did this: a. opened http://www.gnu.org/manual/manual.html b. clicked (selected) make-379.1 c. clicked (selected) PostScript file (291K chars gzipped) d. downloaded completely a file named make.ps.gz e. using gunzip 1.2.4, didgunzip

Re: overzealous @command within canned command sequence in 3.79.1

2001-06-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
This is a known bug; it's been fixed in the source code in CVS and will be included in the next release of GNU make. Thanks for the report! -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:

overzealous @command within canned command sequence in 3.79.1

2001-06-22 Thread E. Jay Berkenbilt
With the following Makefile: define thing echo 1 @echo 2 echo 3 endef test: $(thing) run make. In version 3.79.1, the output is echo 1 1 2 3 In version 3.77, the output is the expected echo 1 1 2 echo 3 3 The behavior in 3.79.1 does not agree with

Re: Possible Bug w/3.79.1?

2001-06-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Chip Cuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cc> If I run gmake without changing anything on SUN, gmake always cc> thinks "Prerequisite `*.o' is newer than target `common.a(*.o)'.". Check the GNU make README; look at the last paragraph. Although not stated there, this issue applies to ar as we

Possible Bug w/3.79.1?

2001-06-22 Thread Chip Cuntz
All, I have the following Makefile that I use to build a static library. The problem is that it works differently on AIX and SUN using v3.79.1. The problem can be described as follows: If I run make without changing anything on AIX, /usr/ccs/bin/make is smart enough to recognize the library is

Re: vpath's and included makefiles

2001-06-22 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: th> So, vpath's don't seem to work for locating 'include' makefiles. For th> example, you can't do this: th>vpath %.d directory th>-include src1.d src2.d src3.d th> Is this by design? This is how it's implemented and documented, yes. The manual