Re: Bug in 3.79?

2000-09-06 Thread Paul D. Smith
Please try the latest version (3.79.1); I believe this problem is already fixed. Thanks. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://www

Bug in 3.79?

2000-09-06 Thread jic
I have found that there is at least one case where the macro FILE_TIMESTAMP_FROM_S_AND_NS in filedef.h is given a -1 in its first  argument, such as when the archive member is not found (around line 1100 in remake.c).  This macro simply multiplies -1 * 10 in environments that support nano

Documentation bugs?

2000-09-06 Thread C Dasgupta
This is the manual for GNU make 3.77, May 1998 1) On P 79 (Sec 9.7), looks like '--jobs=[jobs]' should have been '--jobs[=jobs]' (I sent this bug also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since I was not sure where to send it). 2) By P 43 ( sec 5.7), there have been at least two references to '+' character

RE: switch statement bug on Sol 5.7

2000-09-06 Thread Brown, Nelson
This must have been a problem with my gcc installation. The package from www.sunfreeware.com works fine, but I'm having problems with the GNUgcc 2.95.2 package from sunsite.unc.edu and any gcc re-compiled from it. Regardless, the problem doesn't seem to be with gmake. Thanks. -Original Mess