%% Raymond Nijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rn> ::: "PDS" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> %% Raymond Nijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rn> As a result, my .a files are not deleted if a .o file fails to
rn> compile, and then my executable will link happily in a recurs
::: "PDS" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> %% Raymond Nijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rn> As a result, my .a files are not deleted if a .o file fails to
rn> compile, and then my executable will link happily in a recursive
rn> make environment. This is undesired.
> That me
%% Raymond Nijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
rn> As a result, my .a files are not deleted if a .o file fails to
rn> compile, and then my executable will link happily in a recursive
rn> make environment. This is undesired.
That means your recursive make environment isn't set up correctly
Hi,
When an error occurs in a rule, make will not delete the target if the
timestamp has not changed.
As a result, my .a files are not deleted if a .o file fails to compile, and
then my executable will link happily in a recursive make environment.
This is undesired.
The makefile looks like:
-
Thanks.
--
---
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://www.paulandlesley.org/gmake/
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professi
%% "Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dvl> There is an ancient SEGV bug in file function.c which have a
dvl> trivial fix (attached). Strange why it haven't been fixed yet...
Can you show me an example where this will SEGV? I can't see any way in
which filenm could ever be 0 in th
