%% Shawn Matlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sm> Ok this is funny. I want to install gcc. I need a POSIX-compliant
sm> make. Aparently mine isn't, so GNU make should work.
I doubt your make isn't POSIX compliant. The POSIX definition of make
is so anemic almost any program with the letters
Ok this is funny. I want to install gcc. I need a POSIX-compliant make.
Aparently mine isn't, so GNU make should work. Well, my make won't make GNU
make either. The shell build.sh gives me this:
"/usr/include/sys/machsig.h", line 100: macro BUS_OBJERR redefines previous
macro at "/usr/ucbinclude/
%% "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ms> I'm trying to diagnose a problem I'm having with -j when running on
ms> DYNIX/ptx. This Makefile demonstrates the problem I'm having:
ms> TARGETS = $(patsubst %.abc,%.xyz,$(wildcard *[0-9].abc))
ms> %.xyz: %.abc
ms>
I'm trying to diagnose a problem I'm having with -j when running on
DYNIX/ptx. This Makefile demonstrates the problem I'm having:
--CUT---
TARGETS = $(patsubst %.abc,%.xyz,$(wildcard *[0-9].abc))
%.xyz: %.abc
@touch
%% "Smith, Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sj> I was hoping that you could help me with a little issue I am
sj> working on. I am trying to write a utility that will analyse a
sj> makefile, and create a target 'tree' from it.
I think your best bet is to hack GNU make itself; after it fin
I was hoping that you could help me with a little issue I am working on.
I am trying to write a utility that will analyse a makefile, and create a
target 'tree' from it.
In preparation for this, I thought I would write out the Backus-Nour Fom of
the various elements of a makefile, so that I coul
Paul D. Smith writes:
> Bruno, do you have any thoughts on how we could _safely_ auto-detect a
> "good" gettext implementation? I think it would be satisfactory to
> detect a version of GNU gettext, and brand all other versions "bad",
That's good enough, yes. You can detect GNU gettext by check
