> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, while Eli Zaretskii is still providing excellent support for the
> DOS port of GNU make, it would be great if we had a few more pretesters
> for this port, as well.
I second this. (By "the DOS port
This is PR/1696 in the GNU make bug database. A patch is included in
the resolution (essentially the same fix you used).
You can find info on accessing the GNU make bug database in the README
in the GNU make distribution.
Thanks for the report!
--
-
There is a bug in make-3.79 which was not present in 3.77. I have
confirmed the problem under IRIX 6.5 and SunOS 5.5.1, but I believe it
affects all OSes supporting archives.
When using implicit rules for library archiving, the timestamp is computed
incorrectly for the (not yet existing) target
Paul,
Thanks for your comments. I believe that
someone could devote more time than I have and do
a lot of good things to improve the WIN32 story for GNU make.
I have certainly enjoyed working on the tool. I hope
someone else will seize the challenge. I am glad to
facilitate the transition as wel
Hi all.
Recently Rob Tulloh has notified me that he's no longer able to give the
maintenance of the Windows port of GNU make the attention he would like,
due to other demands on his time. I would like to publicly thank him
for his many years of dedication to and support of that effort, and I
hop