Re: ask for help

2000-04-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
Please don't send HTML to the list. Plain text works just fine, thanks. > I meet some problem when I use make.I can use clean command,it report > error as bellow: > bash.exe: del: command not found "del" is a DOS command. I don't know much about DOS and Windows, but my understanding is th

Re: make-3.79 on BeOS

2000-04-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul D. Smith writes: > Does BeOS have enough of a shell that you can run configure and get > useful results? Yes. It uses GNU bash 2.03. > bh> 2) Error during "make distclean": > > bh> Apparently $(MAKE) = /bework/gnubuild/make-3.79/./make has been > bh> removed during the "make distcle

Re: make-3.79 on BeOS

2000-04-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bh> 1) Compilation error in arscan.c. BeOS doesn't have the bh> header file. But it has archive libraries, and uses the GNU bh> binutils to create them. I therefore copied the contents of bh> glibc's into arscan.c, and verified using "od -x"

Re: Bug in make-3.79

2000-04-17 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: j> extern int debug_flag; /* Declared in main.c */ j> Obviously, you get a link error. I replaced this with a reference to the new DB macro. j> Also, LOCALEDIR is not declared anywhere when using win 32. j> This causes a compile error. I just put j> #d

make-3.79 on BeOS

2000-04-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, When compiling make-3.79 on BeOS, I encountered the following problems: 1) Compilation error in arscan.c. BeOS doesn't have the header file. But it has archive libraries, and uses the GNU binutils to create them. I therefore copied the contents of glibc's into arscan.c, and verified using