Re: viengoos

2009-11-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:21:49PM -0500, steve paesani wrote: > Is there a specific mailing list/discussion area for viengoos? As I said already (I think), the l4-hurd mailing list, <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/mailing_lists/l4-hurd.html>, is sometimes being used f

viengoos

2009-11-02 Thread steve paesani
Is there a specific mailing list/discussion area for viengoos? Steve

Re: viengoos build

2009-10-16 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:47:44PM -0400, steve paesani wrote: > Is this the place for viengoos source compilaton errors? > If not, is there such a place? Either here, or on the l4-hurd list, or directly ask Neal (CCed). Back to your original question: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at

viengoos build

2009-10-06 Thread steve paesani
Hi, I am getting a make error when doing 'make check': l4_uint64_t is undefined. ? anyone know of this and what to do to resolve?

Re: Viengoos build documentation

2008-10-08 Thread Srdan Dukic
2008/10/8 Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > I have documented the Viengoos build process here: > http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/microkernel/building/<http://www.bddebian.com/%7Ewiki/microkernel/building/> I believe the correct link is http://www.bddebian.com/~w

Re: Viengoos build documentation

2008-10-08 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Working link: - http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/microkernel/viengoos/building/ Best wishes, Arne PS: Just checked the wiki repo. Am Mittwoch 08 Oktober 2008 09:27:09 schrieb Shakthi Kannan: > I have documented the Viengoos build process here: > http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/micro

Viengoos build documentation

2008-10-08 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, I have documented the Viengoos build process here: http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/microkernel/building/ Please feel free to add/delete/update the same, SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com

Viengoos (was: client-side memory buffers)

2008-04-05 Thread olafBuddenhagen
while? And > > > would the server allocating the memory passing it to the client > > > using the Mach semantics allow this client-side memory model while > > > avoiding the ability for clients to unmap the data? > > > > Yes, I think such accounting is worthw