On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:37 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:27AM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
>> > This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations
>> > probably spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best. I
>> > entreated Gianluca to check what over implementat
Hi Gianluca,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:07:27AM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> Hm, funny things happens while grepping past mail.
Hehe... Nice to see you here :-)
> > This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations
> > probably spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best
Hm, funny things happens while grepping past mail.
> This is a non-trivial problem. Other unionfs implementations probably
> spent considerable time figuring out how to do it best. I entreated
> Gianluca to check what over implementations do, instead of trying to
> reinvent the wheel -- but he wou
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:00:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> Sergiu, then please remove the shadowfs reference(s) from the GNU
> Hurd Refere
ergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > > I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It
> > > > is formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am
> > > > able to build and view .info files from it.
> [...]
> > > put it in th
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:00:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs doc
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
> > formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now,
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
> formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am able to
> build and view .info files from it.
I don't understand -- why c
Hello,
I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am able to
build and view .info files from it. However, according to
http://preview.tinyurl.com/lfy436, I will be able to add this document
to the
