Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Take a look at both ext2fs and ufs. Neither deallocates its reference to
> > the underlying node.
>
> Contrary to the propaganda of the time, Bushnells do write bugs.
> Copying them doesn't make them less wrong.
Oops, I'm wrong.
It's not a bug, I
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Take a look at both ext2fs and ufs. Neither deallocates its reference to
> > the underlying node.
>
> Contrary to the propaganda of the time, Bushnells do write bugs.
> Copying them doesn't make them less wrong.
Indeed, those are bugs. Miles (in
> If we want to do as you suggest and only destroy a node when the there is
> no active translator, we must add a user reference when an active
> translator is started and drop one when the control port dies. This
> implies asking for dead name notification on active translator control
> ports an
