Hello,
At last I get some time to get back to this
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 17 Feb 2009 15:29:32 +0100, a écrit :
> diff -u -p -r1.11 io-stat.c
> --- libdiskfs/io-stat.c 12 Apr 2001 19:43:43 - 1.11
> +++ libdiskfs/io-stat.c 17 Feb 2009 14:27:30 -
> @@ -45,6 +46,9 @@ diskfs
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:26:46AM +0100, I wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:34:16AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > FS to round values up (I could see that on a machine that has both
> > second- and ns-precision filesystems). Maybe we should do the same: in
> > the diskfs_S_file_utim
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:34:16AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> FS to round values up (I could see that on a machine that has both
> second- and ns-precision filesystems). Maybe we should do the same: in
> the diskfs_S_file_utimes () and diskfs_set_node_times ()
Rather than doing it ev
> But does it sound right to implement it through a callback that the fs
> provides to libdiskfs when the latter needs to normalize a time stamp?
I don't see how else it could be.
The granularity of stored time stamps is format knowledge.
Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Feb 2009 10:32:30 -0800, a écrit :
> libdiskfs ought to normalize time stamps to match what will appear on disk,
> before it ever reports them to the user.
Right, we at least agree on what we want :)
But does it sound right to implement it through a callback that the fs
libdiskfs ought to normalize time stamps to match what will appear on disk,
before it ever reports them to the user.
Hello,
There is a time coherency issue between libdiskfs and ext2fs: say a
program does:
fd = open ("foo", O_CREAT | RDONLY, 0777);
fstat (fd, &stat1);
close (fd);
...
stat ("foo", &stat2);
then timespec_cmp (&stat1.st_a
