Re: qemu -kernel-kqemu

2008-04-30 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:23:33AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], le Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:09:22 +0200, a écrit : > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:16:12AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > GNU/Hurd spends most of its time in userland in servers ;) > > > > Do you *know* that,

Re: qemu -kernel-kqemu

2008-04-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Tue 29 Apr 2008 01:09:22 +0200, a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:16:12AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > GNU/Hurd spends most of its time in userland in servers ;) > > Do you *know* that, or is it just a guess?... ps says so, but I guess it only accounts for somet

Re: qemu -kernel-kqemu

2008-04-29 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 02:16:12AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > GNU/Hurd spends most of its time in userland in servers ;) Do you *know* that, or is it just a guess?... I would think that in many situations a considerable amount of time is actally spent in the kernel, doing RPC, VM stuff

qemu -kernel-kqemu

2008-04-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Some people have reported having troubles with kqemu. Actually, they are not having problems with user kqemu, but kernel kqemu. With just modprobe kqemu and no -kernel-kqemu, one gets kqemu acceleration in guest's user mode and that works plain fine. -kernel-kqemu enables acceleration fo