Re: pthreads inline functions break libgcc_s.so

2004-07-27 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
At 26 Jul 2004 16:07:27 -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think we should just remove those inline functions, because it's > > dubious whether they are a really faster and they do break > > things. What do you think? > > How on earth is it

Re: pthreads inline functions break libgcc_s.so

2004-07-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we should just remove those inline functions, because it's > dubious whether they are a really faster and they do break > things. What do you think? How on earth is it dubious if they are really faster?

pthreads inline functions break libgcc_s.so

2004-07-22 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
Michael Banck reported on IRC that the libgcc_s.so of the gcc 3.4 debian packages fail with the following error: /lib/libgcc_s.so: undefined reference to `_pthread_mutex_lock' objdump -T /lib/libgcc_s.so | grep pthread gives the following: 23:19 < azeem> D *UND*