Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:04:21PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:33:17PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>>> * Does the small interrupt routine in the kernel already exists?
>>
>> The problem is that this routine is actually pretty device-specific.
>> In Linux UIO at least, ever
Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 14:12:37 schrieb Zheng Da:
> No, I don't see any messages about it. The one I get seems to be a scan
> copy. Maybe I shouldn't upload it.
Either that or you could just ask the one who sent it to you.
I'm sorry to play copyright monkey here.
I don't really like the way
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 00:44:20 schrieb Da Zheng:
>> It works. I have got a copy:-)
>> I wonder where I can upload it to?
>
> Did they explicitely allow you to upload it?
>
> Sometimes people/organizations enforce the rule that pape
Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 00:44:20 schrieb Da Zheng:
> It works. I have got a copy:-)
> I wonder where I can upload it to?
Did they explicitely allow you to upload it?
Sometimes people/organizations enforce the rule that papers must not be
published privately, and they might not like the paper
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Confirmed. Neither is it (it's part of the ``Proceedings of the USENIX
Mach III Symposium'', by the way) available at my university's library or
another library nearby.
Options:
* Thomas, Roland (CCed): Do you have a copy somewhere?
* Send email to the authors, aski
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:33:17PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
The paper "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" gives very short description of
the user-level device management: Devices can be managed from
user-level by vectoring all device interrupts out to an applicat
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:47:33PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:21:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > What also could be done, and what I had in mind for a long time
> > already, is a simple driver for a SoundBlaster ISA card (again, no PCI
> > for
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:21:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> What also could be done, and what I had in mind for a long time
> already, is a simple driver for a SoundBlaster ISA card (again, no PCI
> for now -- I don't know if PCI device registration actually is
> difficult, but let's s
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:33:17PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> The paper "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" gives very short description of
> the user-level device management: Devices can be managed from
> user-level by vectoring all device interrupts out to an application's
> thread. The kernel maps
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:48:24PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> I am thinking about writing user-level device drivers. When I searched
> Internet, I found the paper "An Architecture for Device Drivers
> Executing as User-Level Tasks" written by David B. Golub, Guy G.
> Sotomayor and Freeman
Hi,
The paper "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" gives very short description of
the user-level device management:
Devices can be managed from user-level by vectoring all device
interrupts out to an application's thread. The kernel maps to user space
the device's registers, a shared page containing
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:27:38PM +0800, Zheng Da wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:04 AM, wrote:
> > AFAIK the standard Mach single-server is called US. It's probably
> > available somewhere -- at least UX (the multi-server) must be, as I
> > downloaded it a while back...
> Actually, US i
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:04 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:01:58PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
>
>> I just read "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" and realized that the
>> developers of Mach 3.0 actually developed user-level drivers for the
>> Ethernet and the SCSI disk.
>
> Where did y
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:23:19AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> The user-level Ethernet driver for Mach 3.0 is distributed as part of
> the single-server UNIX emulator. Is The single-server UNIX emulator
> from CMU called poe?
I don't know what POE is.
AFAIK the standard Mach single-server is c
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:01:58PM +0800, Da Zheng wrote:
> I just read "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" and realized that the
> developers of Mach 3.0 actually developed user-level drivers for the
> Ethernet and the SCSI disk.
Where did you get that? I'd like to read it too :-)
-antrik-
Hi,
Da Zheng wrote:
I just read "An I/O System for Mach 3.0" and realized that the
developers of Mach 3.0 actually developed user-level drivers for the
Ethernet and the SCSI disk.
It is certainly very good news to me, though I need to find them first:-)
The user-level Ethernet driver for Mac
Hi,
Barry deFreese wrote:
Yay!! Someone is finally tackling this!! I have been looking at
DDEKit, XNUs IOKit, and some others. I don't know shite but if I can
be of any help, let me know!
Thank you, Barry. I will definitely turn you for help.
The problem is that I don't have much experiment
Da Zheng wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking about writing user-level device drivers. When I searched
Internet, I found the paper "An Architecture for Device Drivers
Executing as User-Level Tasks" written by David B. Golub, Guy G.
Sotomayor and Freeman L. Rawson, III. It might be exactly what I want
bu
Hi,
I am thinking about writing user-level device drivers. When I searched
Internet, I found the paper "An Architecture for Device Drivers
Executing as User-Level Tasks" written by David B. Golub, Guy G.
Sotomayor and Freeman L. Rawson, III. It might be exactly what I want
but unfortunately,
19 matches
Mail list logo
