Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-28 Thread Roland McGrath
> As James noted, there is no oskit_smp in oskit now. I further checked > with: "grep -n smp `find . -name Makefile\*`" and there is no mention > of `smp' in there. Although, their release notes don' mention > dropping support. Oops. I never noticed because my machine has an old installation s

Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-27 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:17:16PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > As to the removal of -loskit_smp, that obviously breaks the SMP build. > Having the library there when building without SMP is harmless. As James noted, there is no oskit_smp in oskit now. I further checked with: "grep -n smp `fi

Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-20 Thread James Morrison
> This should not be required. My build is fine without it. Did you have oskit 2001 installed in /usr/lib before you installed oskit 2002? > > The compiler by itself with the CC and CFLAGS settings you put in the > environment (or don't) for configure need to be correct for finding the > os

Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-19 Thread Roland McGrath
> At lunch I started a compile of oskit with gcc-3, and it appears to > have built. I'm going to play with an all gcc-3 based > oskit+oskit-mach when I get home tonight. Ok. I don't know what to expect from this. The problems of compiler vs linux drivers tend to be of the nature that an indivi

Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-19 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:04:57PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I had a moment, so I decided to try building oskit-mach with > > gcc-3.0. Note that this is linked against an oskit build with > > gcc-2.95.4. It appears to work (boot, mount filesystem, ping > > localhost) > Great! Thanks fo

Re: Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-19 Thread Roland McGrath
> I had a moment, so I decided to try building oskit-mach with gcc-3.0. > Note that this is linked against an oskit build with gcc-2.95.4. It > appears to work (boot, mount filesystem, ping localhost) Great! Thanks for verifying that this works. > Aside from the usual two patches, it compiled

Oskit-mach success with gcc-3.0

2002-04-18 Thread Jeff Bailey
I had a moment, so I decided to try building oskit-mach with gcc-3.0. Note that this is linked against an oskit build with gcc-2.95.4. It appears to work (boot, mount filesystem, ping localhost) Aside from the usual two patches, it compiled fine. However, i386asm.symc has the following: i386as

Re: oskit-mach success

2002-03-18 Thread Daniel Wagner
It seems oskit-20020317 works fine with oskit-mach. Unfortunatly there are some small things which were reportet on the oskit mailling list, but not fixed yet. Basically the problems are sbrk-hack.c is not needed anymore (as it seems) and the obscure GFP_ATOMIC definition in skbufio.h. I will

Re: oskit-mach success

2002-03-18 Thread James Morrison
--- Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:18:27PM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > > Well, I compiled the newest version of oskit today, I added the tlan > driver to > > oskit and oskit-mach compiled and run with the following patch. > > That's nice. I don't know

Re: oskit-mach success

2002-03-18 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:18:27PM -0800, James Morrison wrote: > Well, I compiled the newest version of oskit today, I added the tlan driver to > oskit and oskit-mach compiled and run with the following patch. That's nice. I don't know if it's possible to just change all the Linux driver code t

oskit-mach success

2002-03-17 Thread James Morrison
Well, I compiled the newest version of oskit today, I added the tlan driver to oskit and oskit-mach compiled and run with the following patch. However, I did notice that my oskit-mach kernel did not boot the Hurd directly. I had to go back to using serverboot. 2002-03-17 James A. Morrison <[E