> > I doubt this is true. If it is, it's a server-side bug. Note that
> > S_IPTRANS and the gnu.translator xattr are found on nodes opened with
> > O_NOTRANS. They will more or less never be seen by the file name-based
> > calls, only by f*xattr on an fd opened using O_NOTRANS.
>
> I see. Th
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:15:48PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > if (value != NULL && bufsz > *size)
> > return ERANGE;
> > *size = bufsz;
>
> That fix leaks in the ERANGE case. I did a different fix.
> Please verify it.
It works just as fine.
> > Our tests seemed to hav
Thanks for looking at this. I've committed the code on the glibc trunk
now. If there are further problems please file a glibc bugzilla report
in the "hurd" componenet.
> When getxattr gets called with VALUE as NULL and *SIZE as 0 (to
> determine the length of the xattr value), SIZE will be small
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 03:58:38PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Not tested in the slightest.
Ben Asselstine and I tested and debugged this now. With a couple of
small changes, attr's getfattr/setfattr commands and star work fine for
gnu.translator and gnu.author.
> +error_t
> +_hurd_xattr
Ignore my last e-mail Roland. It appears that attr is using GNU/Linux
syscalls instead of the glibc functions. I have re-built attr without
syscalls.c and some of the functions are working so I need to do some more
testing/investigation.
Thanks,
Barry (aka bddebian)
___
- Original Message -
From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: new version of glibc xattr patch
This adds the missint {f,}{list,remove}xattr functions.
Not tested in the slightest.
OK, here are the results from the l
Index: hurd/xattr.c
===
RCS file: hurd/xattr.c
diff -N hurd/xattr.c
--- /dev/null1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ hurd/xattr.c 6 Mar 2005 23:56:43 -
...
+error_t
+_hurd_xattr_list (io_t port, void *
- Original Message -
From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: new version of glibc xattr patch
> > Please forgive my dumb ass. What should just be
> Please forgive my dumb ass. What should just be zeros? s/size/0 in
> fremovexattr.c ??
Yes.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
- Original Message -
From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: new version of glibc xattr patch
> Those should just be 0s.
Please forgive my dumb ass.
Those should just be 0s.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
- Original Message -
From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: new version of glibc xattr patch
This adds the missint {f,}{list,remove}xattr functions.
Not tested in the slightest.
OK, so I am trying to rebuild gli
This adds the missint {f,}{list,remove}xattr functions.
Not tested in the slightest.
2005-03-06 Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* hurd/hurd/xattr.h: New file.
* hurd/xattr.c: New file.
* hurd/Makefile (routines): Add it.
* sysdeps/mach/hurd/fgetxattr.c: New f
13 matches
Mail list logo
