Simon Josefsson, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:10:43 +0200, a écrit :
> As reported as 2) in this mail:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
>
> it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on
> success.
>
> This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with
Simon Josefsson, le Thu 04 Aug 2011 12:10:43 +0200, a écrit :
> it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on
> success.
>
> This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with the specification at
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/nanosleep.html
>
> It see
As reported as 2) in this mail:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-08/msg00027.html
it seems the nanosleep function modifies the second parameter on
success.
This behaviour doesn't seem consistent with the specification at
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/function