Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's questionable that they should be artificially hidden in the first > place, but hey. =) The purpose of /sbin is not to "hide" anything, but to avoid cluttering users' command namespace with commands they can't usefully ever use. ___

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 12:35, Robert Millan wrote: > do you mean that someday we eventualy won't need /sbin at all? if that's > the case i don't mind working the problem around by adding /sbin to PATH I think that's a nice long term ideal. As soon as you take the idea that users are gods of their

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-09 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:04:41AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > I think I see two potential solutions to this: > > 1) /sbin should be added to every users path on i386-gnu systems. The > concept of a binary that is completely unusable for regular users is > almost unheard of for us. (The only