Re: looking into the amd64 arch problems

2007-03-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Constantine Kousoulos, le Thu 08 Mar 2007 20:16:10 +0200, a écrit : > Since my notebook has a turion processor, shouldn't 'uname -m' > produce something like 'x86_64'? No, because GNU Mach only supports AMD64 processors in 32bits mode. Samuel ___ Bug

Re: looking into the amd64 arch problems

2007-03-08 Thread Constantine Kousoulos
Hello again, the bug report continues: # uname -m i386-AT386 Since my notebook has a turion processor, shouldn't 'uname -m' produce something like 'x86_64'? Uname seems to be buggy even when a non-amd processor is concerned, as i have pointed out earlier (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/b

Re: looking into the amd64 arch problems

2007-03-05 Thread Constantine Kousoulos
Samuel Thibault wrote: Constantine Kousoulos, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 20:37:25 +0200, a ιcrit : I know that the amd64 arch is a big problem. Maybe with a little help i could pinpoint some bugs and, maybe, fix them. I wouldn't say so big a problem, since Mach got to boot fine :) :) ./native-in

Re: looking into the amd64 arch problems

2007-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Constantine Kousoulos, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 20:37:25 +0200, a écrit : > I know that the amd64 arch is a big problem. Maybe with a little > help i could pinpoint some bugs and, maybe, fix them. I wouldn't say so big a problem, since Mach got to boot fine :) > ./native-install: line 138:16 Kille

looking into the amd64 arch problems

2007-03-05 Thread Constantine Kousoulos
Hello all, I tried installing Hurd on my Turion powered notebook from a Debian K14 GNU/Hurd cd and these are the results. The system boots without problems the first time! :-O The problems start after the commands #export TERM=mach #./native-install Although 'native-install' "completes" and