On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:26:20AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:36:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with
> > stdio too. The iconv and gconv modules aren't that essential, we can
> > fix it later IMHO. I don't
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:31:55AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > > The testsuite won't even run, which suggests larger problems. I'm
> > > not worried about individual tests failing.
>
> > > I suspect there's not alot to get ri
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The testsuite won't even run, which suggests larger problems. I'm
> > not worried about individual tests failing.
> > I suspect there's not alot to get right, and no reason we can't do
> > it this week.
> Strange, it worked fo
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:36:32PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is
> > failing. I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
> I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with
> stdio too. The iconv and gconv modules a
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:34:51PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> The only thing I'm not certain about yet is why make check is failing.
> I've set that as one of my tasks this week.
I don't think that's a showstopper, some of the tests fail with stdio
too. The iconv and gconv modules aren't that es
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:01:26AM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Do you have any preferance as to when that occurs?
>
> Not really (you're the people doing the builds that are affected). But I
> would like to see some more testing. I thought there were still some
> spurious errors that were
> Do you have any preferance as to when that occurs?
Not really (you're the people doing the builds that are affected). But I
would like to see some more testing. I thought there were still some
spurious errors that were unexplained, though maybe I am just unclear on
which fixes affected which
--- Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
>
> > It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we
> > are ready to nix the pre-libio packag
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:12:29PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
> It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we
> are ready to nix the pre-libio package archive.
Do you have any preferance as to when that o
> Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio?
It's my intention to do that when and only when we are quite sure we are
ready to nix the pre-libio package archive.
> 1) Try builds with Marcus' ioperms patches. This requires oskit-mach
> headers (which I have) but I would pref
Roland,
I did a build this morning of the latest CVS glibc_2.2 brnach, and
your changes appear to fix the select problem.
Would you consider setting the default stdio for us to libio? Marcus
has produced an amazing number of libio packages, and there are a few
folks now running libio instead of
11 matches
Mail list logo
