On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> Actually, after applying the libpager patch only, as opposed to using
> the continuous integration packages which merge all of Justus' work,
> things look much better. So far I haven't been able to reproduce the
> problem despite even
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> Stressing the file system (by building a large package such as
> iceweasel) triggers a reference counting assertion [1]. We'll have to
> squash this bug hard before the patch can be merged.
Actually, after applying the libpager patch
Quoting Richard Braun (2014-10-28 17:59:16)
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> > Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising
> > (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho
> > if there is an issue, it should be unr
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising
> (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho
> if there is an issue, it should be unrelated to this change]). We
> will keep you posted.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote:
> Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising
> (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho
> if there is an issue, it should be unrelated to this change]). We
> will keep you posted.
Hello :)
this is a new patch that makes libpager use a fixed number of threads,
currently one (plus one receiving messages and enqueuing them into a
userspace queue). If our store interface improves, we can increase
the number of worker threads (the work delegation uses a linear scan
over the wor
